Question about using v3 BETAs

Can we already use flexicontent 3 on work projects?

I have Joomla 3.4 running with FLEXIcontent v3 Beta 3 without problems: www.muenstermann.com
Rooney

Hello

you can definetely use v3 BETA3 for new websites

and in existing website if you have a bug of v2.2.1 that you really need to get fixed


- so far the most important (-new-) bugs i have found in BETA3 are:

a. new parameter hidding hides some parameters in image field (inside the "image source" TAB)
so you can not change the existing or the default values

b. the labels in item form are not marked as invalid, so the scroll-focus for required: image field and for relation , does not work


these are fixed in v3 BETA4c but maybe there are more or new

Ok, I understand that the 3 version can easily be put on top of 2? What packages translation? they compatible?

Hello

yes no problem with language strings, they are,

but there are several new language strings for backend !

Very good. When planning to release?

Hello

backend UI is mostly done,

there are some in the TODO list for v3,

new backend UI almost done, field grouping, and many other ... like the updated universal module, plus some new fields !, and more power for existing ones !


TODO:
- mostly work related to templating
e.g. frontend template selector/switcher
- finish cascade-dependency for select/selectmultiple/radio(image)/checkbox(image)
- more flexible frontend templating (maybe will be in v3.1)
- enable tags/favourites via category model
- add "authoring" params to usergroup
and some other related to author
- other

no time-frame depends on other work not related to FLEXIcontent, estimate ? maybe end of March ?

March is cool. New style I like admin. Where to write minor tweaks? For example as follows:
[attachment=0:26jw4oez]<!-- ia0 -->Без-имени-1.png<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:26jw4oez]

Hello

you ask how to propose fixes or improvements ?

e.g. via pull requests in GitHub

e.g. in your picture i see that padding is missing in select drop-down "sub-groups"

Yes it is in the sub-groups of the indentation.