Releated items bug j2.5

tevez15
Topic Author
Offline
Elite Member

12 years 6 months ago #31014 by tevez15

Releated items bug j2.5 was created by tevez15

Hi

I found a bug in related, i choose include option and 1 category, but in insert view(form) the field show all of categories?

Another thing, its possible use that like filter?

Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

ggppdk
Offline
Administrator

12 years 6 months ago #31016 by ggppdk

Replied by ggppdk on topic Releated items bug j2.5

all? maybe you have enable inclusion of subcategories?

-- Flexicontent is Free but involves a big effort on our part.
Like the our support? (for a bug-free FC, despite having a long list of functions) Like the features? Like the ongoing development and future commitment to FLEXIcontent?
-- Add your voice to the FLEXIcontent JED listing with a 5-star...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

tevez15
Topic Author
Offline
Elite Member

12 years 6 months ago #31033 by tevez15

Replied by tevez15 on topic Releated items bug j2.5

i think in that to, but no, the option are "No".

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

ggppdk
Offline
Administrator

12 years 6 months ago #31034 by ggppdk

Replied by ggppdk on topic Releated items bug j2.5

mmm, i ll verify, about filter, you want a category title filter like we have an item title filter , right?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

denniskobus
Offline
Junior Member

12 years 6 months ago #31087 by denniskobus

Replied by denniskobus on topic Releated items bug j2.5

for that bug i have the same:

content scope filter by type works as expected,
but by category seems to have no effect

thanks, dennis

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

denniskobus
Offline
Junior Member

12 years 6 months ago #31426 by denniskobus

Replied by denniskobus on topic Releated items bug j2.5

to my own surpise i may have solved this bug by adding:

$catids = $field->parameters->get('catids'); on line 52

seemed like de catids where not picked up

hope you agree,
dennis

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.